Showing posts with label Urban Renewal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Urban Renewal. Show all posts

April 6, 2012

SandBoxBlogs: Aspen Times "Basalt trailer park redevelopment outlined"

Scott Condon:
"The redevelopment plans hinge on finding a place to build replacement housing for those being displaced from the 37 trailers and one manufactured home on the property.

“Although the (Roaring Fork Community Development Corp.) is open to the possibility of affordable housing units on the campus site, the logistics of relocating the current residents, what we know about their housing preferences and the costs involved in creating affordable housing units makes it very likely that the required housing will be located on a secondary parcel,” the application said..."
(Read more?  Click title)

"Unapologetically pursuing and tracking patterns within the news others make since 2010."

March 2, 2012

SandBoxBlogs: Glenwood Springs Post Independent "Silt will lend $170,000 to help Dollar General store"

Hey, how about that Town of Silt, Colorado!  Just look at these projections:

John Colson:
"...On Tuesday, the trustees voted unanimously to transfer $170,000 from the town's Water and Wastewater Activity Enterprise fund to a newly created Economic Development Revolving Fund. The revolving fund, according to the authorizing resolution passed by the trustees, is then to loan the $170,000 to the Silt Urban Renewal Authority.

The money is to be used to install utility lines, stormwater drains, curb and gutter, and other infrastructure.

In addition to the fund transfer, the trustees agreed to kick in $10,000 in town funds to the Dollar General Urban Renewal Project, mainly to pay for legal and engineering fees and for staff time spent on the project.

The $170,000 loan to the authority, for a period of up to 15 years, is to earn 3 percent interest. It is to be repaid from sales and property tax revenues generated by the store.

According to town documents, the new store has projected annual sales of $1 million, which is expected to generate $30,000 in annual sales tax receipts. The town also expects to receive more than $14,000 in annual property tax revenues, based on the expected $900,000 value of the Dollar General building.

In addition, the town expects the store will generate roughly $20,000 per year in tax increment financing, or TIF, payments, based on the increased taxable value of the property as a result of the efforts of the urban renewal authority..."  (Read more?  Click title)

"Unapologetically pursuing and tracking patterns within the news others make since 2010."

February 6, 2012

SandBox Comments: Glenwood Springs Post Independent/Your Letters "Clarifying details on Silt Urban Renewal Authority"

(See related story here)

It really isn't "incredibly intense scrutiny", Rick.

It's a systemic problem  of a style of yellow journalism that the PI creates, perpetuates and enhances at every opportunity. Accomplishing nothing but harm to area residents and communities.

SandBox doesn't support Silt's URA at state and federal levels.  But, we do support Silt developing a working relationship with GarCo.  We should be keeping all of the money, including the seed and capital funds, right here at home.

"...The county did not give money to our URA or for economic development, as stated in Wednesday's paper. They set aside money for infrastructure improvements, just as they did in Rifle and Parachute. Those improvements may or may not be associated with a URA project...." (Read more?  Click title)
(Richard Aluise, Silt)

"Unapologetically pursuing and tracking patterns within the news others make since 2010."

January 31, 2012

SandBox Comments: Glenwood Springs Post Independent/Your Letters "Why is Silt's URA so appalling to BOCC?"

Posting up a letter to the editor by Carl McWilliams of Silt is like walking through a minefield for 'SandBox Nanny'.

She and a very large majority of the local population disagree with many of McWilliams views and how he goes about his anti-gas industry activism.

But today, McWilliams is dead on with his critcism of 'how' Garfield BOCC put Silt through its paces over their Urban Renewal request.

SandBox doesn't think there's some 'grand conspiracy' such as McWilliams insinuates in this letter. 

We do think there is a glimpse into a growing sense of empowerment that does make one feel a little uneasy.  With that said, we do not believe the friction is because we have an all Republican board of commissioners.

Our impression here on SandBoxBlogs is that the newly elected Jankovsky needs some balancing out and the way to do that is to change our county charter and laws to increase the board size from (3) commissioners to at least (6). 

For a county the size of Garfield it is necessary.

As far as Silt and their assistance from GarCo, we know they will spend the money very wisely and the benefits from that renewal will be seen far and wide as a very, very good move on GarCo's part.


"Unapologetically pursuing and tracking patterns within the news others make since 2010."

January 25, 2012

SandBox Comments: Glenwood Springs Post Independent "Garfield County pledges $1M for Silt infrastructure"

Now this, is much better.  (See related stories and comments here.)

Our county should be looking after its own instead of pushing them out to the necessity of reaching  for federal funding.

SandBox is sure this money is going to be spent very wisely.  Silt Mayor Dave Moore and the Trustees are all doing a great job. Despite the very small handful of Silt residents who simply cannot seem to ever find anything to be positive and encouraged for when it comes to town politics.

Congratulations to the Town of Silt!

(Read article?  Click title. Comment to discuss)