"After the City Council has repeatedly refused to allow an agenda item and public comment on the decision, the Election Commission scheduled a public dialogue for 4 p.m. on Nov. 1 in the City Council chambers. All City Council members and the public have been encouraged to attend by Election Commissioner Ward Hauenstein...."
(Marilyn Marks)
Provocative wording? Yes.
Makes her point well and you're listening to her? You betcha.
Liked by most readers? Doesn't matter.
Worthy cause? Debatable. Most think very worthy.
Deserves to be ridiculed, defamed, slandered, shunned and abused with verbal assaults? No.
Political activist making great strides in catalyzing entrenched issues within local, state and national politics? Yes and doing a terrific job worthy of high praise.
Needs to be personally liked or socially acceptable to the majority in order to do that terrific job?
Nope. But should be.
Any of the above can be said about Marilyn Marks.
What's important in this post is the information on the Nov. 1, 2011 community input meeting.
Because if you have something to say about Marilyn Marks?
Please go say it there or cease and desist the public onslaught of defamation or slander against her.
just sayin.
(Read more? Click title and comment to start discussion)
1 comment:
Didn't see anything in the newspapers today on this meeting. Anybody know how it went?
Post a Comment