February 9, 2012

SandBox Comments: Power Line/Steven Hayward "Liberals and the Constitution"

(See related story here.  Take a look at the Egyptian media outlet she chose. Read a supporting view  of Ginsburg here)

For SandBox, it wasn't just her views of our constitution.  It was the fact that she chose to express herself on MEMRI T.V. and while in Egypt.   She should be impeached and certainly not held in regard for her choice.


Steven Hayward:
"Liberals typically erupt in outrage if you suggest they don’t respect or understand the Constitution, let alone defend it.  But then they let slip that in fact they really don’t respect or understand the Constitution.  Think of Ezra Klein remarking a couple years back on how the Constitution is too hard to understand because, like, it’s over a hundred years old man!*  And this week Barack Obama proved himself once again the perfect epigone of Woodrow Wilson—the first president to criticize the Constitution and the principles of the American Founding—with his remarks to NBC’s Matt Lauer that one reason he hasn’t succeeded in fulfilling his campaign promises to transform the world is that “it turns out our Founders designed a system that makes it more difficult to bring about change than I would like sometimes.”  It turns out?  He’s just discovering this now?  (Well, one thing that “turns out” is that the only constitutional law Obama actually taught at the University of Chicago was the equal protection clause.  Apparently he skipped over that whole “separation of powers” stuff.)

But the prize for this week’s liberal obtuseness about the Constitution goes to Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who told an Egyptian television audience that “I would not look to the U.S. Constitution if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012.”   Instead, “I might look at the constitution of South Africa.  That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, had an independent judiciary.”  She added that “you should certainly be aided by all the constitution-writing that has gone one since the end of World War II....”  (Read more?  Click title)

"Unapologetically pursuing and tracking patterns within the news others make since 2010."

2 comments:

jbend said...

Ginsburg might as well have walked down into the heart of Hamas, Hezbollah or Iran and declared her undying devotion to terrorism. That is the sum total of what she did by putting her opinions up on MEMRI t.v. It's deserving of more than just impeaching her. She should be charged with treason because of the position she holds in our country.

Ben said...

Any pundit that throws support behind Ginsburg on this is way off base and needs to spend about 10 minutes crawling the site of MEMRI TV. If it even takes 10 minutes to see the problem. She should be charged.