This is amazing news out of the City of Aspen and Pitkin County.
A near 180 degree shift into the world of the common man and into reality.
The very idea that councilman, mayors and commissioners would even be aware that there are growing numbers of homeless and hungry in the community and an entire majority of next step up from that status citizens who look on the outside like they have more than they really do; is astounding in itself.
But for them to move forward so quickly after becoming aware and work toward righting wrongs is not only wonderful, it is commendable.
Thank you so much to the City of Aspen and Pitkin County for taking the reins.
Now, how can all those falling through the cracks or barely above water help make this resource work? By no longer being silent. Speak in anonymity if what you have to say goes against big money somewhere or puts you in harm's way. Just don't be silent and give them the chance to get accurate data.
Appoint a spokesperson who will keep you shielded, ask authorities for a means of anonymous communication to them. Just speak up.
Dorothy Atkins:
"The city has earmarked $10,000 to come up with statistical models that asses local affordable housing demand.
The study is being done in preparation for a housing summit that will take place this fall and will include public officials from the city and county.
The study will seek to answer what percentage of the population lives in Pitkin County and works in adjacent counties; what the income distribution is of workers in the county and how it compares to the supply of affordable housing units, and finally, how the increase of retirees leaving the workforce affects the supply of available units. The study also will look at what percentage of the local workforce actually wants to live in affordable housing units.
“This is the kind of information we’ve begun to prepare,” said Barry Crook, assistant city manager. “And part of that is we want to get [officials] to hone in on what they want the summit to accomplish.....”
(Read more? Click title)
"Unapologetically pursuing and tracking patterns within the news others make since 2010."
Showing posts with label Colorado Self Sufficiency Standard. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Colorado Self Sufficiency Standard. Show all posts
May 7, 2012
May 1, 2012
SandBoxBlogs: In These Times "In Aspen, Privileged Class Pits Immigrant Workers Against Environment"
What happens when you put controversy, problems, issues, concerns and questions behind closed doors and let only a few control the outcome?
Same thing as what happens when you censor, ban and quash the human voice and spirit.
The 800 lb. gorilla in the room gains tons more weight and your "secret" becomes the worst kept secret in the land.
Funny how that works.
How many more media outlets listening in to all news chatter is it going to take to get the folks transparency issues in all regional counties dealt with properly?
Good take on the 'other side of paradise' by Kari Lyderson. Somewhere out there on the very popular and well followed publication 'In These Times'.
Kari Lyderson:
"The Slums of Aspen details the controversy over a proposed immigration detention facility in the town of Glenwood Springs 40 miles east of Aspen, a relatively more affordable area where many immigrant workers live. (In Glenwood Springs the median home value is a still pricey $400,000, compared to $4.3 million in Aspen.)
The debate over the detention center highlighted the fact that many ski resorts employ large numbers of young European, Australian and New Zealand immigrants who come on work visas but frequently overstay them – becoming "undocumented" like their Latino counterparts. Yet they draw little scrutiny or antipathy from native residents or government officials, and resorts often highlight their internationalism by listing European and Australian/ Kiwi employees’ home country on their name tags....."
(Read more? Click title)
"Unapologetically pursuing and tracking patterns within the news others make since 2010."
Same thing as what happens when you censor, ban and quash the human voice and spirit.
The 800 lb. gorilla in the room gains tons more weight and your "secret" becomes the worst kept secret in the land.
Funny how that works.
How many more media outlets listening in to all news chatter is it going to take to get the folks transparency issues in all regional counties dealt with properly?
Good take on the 'other side of paradise' by Kari Lyderson. Somewhere out there on the very popular and well followed publication 'In These Times'.
Kari Lyderson:
"The Slums of Aspen details the controversy over a proposed immigration detention facility in the town of Glenwood Springs 40 miles east of Aspen, a relatively more affordable area where many immigrant workers live. (In Glenwood Springs the median home value is a still pricey $400,000, compared to $4.3 million in Aspen.)
The debate over the detention center highlighted the fact that many ski resorts employ large numbers of young European, Australian and New Zealand immigrants who come on work visas but frequently overstay them – becoming "undocumented" like their Latino counterparts. Yet they draw little scrutiny or antipathy from native residents or government officials, and resorts often highlight their internationalism by listing European and Australian/ Kiwi employees’ home country on their name tags....."
(Read more? Click title)
"Unapologetically pursuing and tracking patterns within the news others make since 2010."
April 23, 2012
SandBoxBlogs: Aspen Daily News "County demand for food stamps continues on its four-year climb"
Andrew Travers:
"Demand from Pitkin County residents for federal food assistance has increased more than five-fold in recent years.
The number of low-income locals using the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) continued its dramatic rise in 2011, demonstrating continuing economic hardship for some area residents. Since 2007, the number of clients has gone up 558 percent, while the funds used have risen 836 percent.
A total of 171 county households took part in the program in 2011. They were granted a total of more than $453,000 in food vouchers.
“We are deluged,” said county health and human services director Nan Sundeen. “The demand for public assistance has grown, and staying on top of it is our biggest challenge.”
The SNAP program — which no longer uses actual stamps, but debit cards instead — allows participants to purchase bread, vegetables, meat and other food products. It blocks purchases of non-food items like vitamins, tobacco and liquor.
Due to the historically scant number of Aspenites using food stamps, the county has not typically devoted many resources to the program. The county partners with Eagle County to oversee food cards for the mid- to upper-Roaring Fork Valley. Demand has stretched both governments’ resources thin. Pitkin County paid to add a new staff position in 2010 to meet the unprecedented demand.
While the feds pay for the benefits, local governments pay to administer the program...."
(Read more? Click title)
"Unapologetically pursuing and tracking patterns within the news others make since 2010."
"Demand from Pitkin County residents for federal food assistance has increased more than five-fold in recent years.
The number of low-income locals using the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) continued its dramatic rise in 2011, demonstrating continuing economic hardship for some area residents. Since 2007, the number of clients has gone up 558 percent, while the funds used have risen 836 percent.
A total of 171 county households took part in the program in 2011. They were granted a total of more than $453,000 in food vouchers.
“We are deluged,” said county health and human services director Nan Sundeen. “The demand for public assistance has grown, and staying on top of it is our biggest challenge.”
The SNAP program — which no longer uses actual stamps, but debit cards instead — allows participants to purchase bread, vegetables, meat and other food products. It blocks purchases of non-food items like vitamins, tobacco and liquor.
Due to the historically scant number of Aspenites using food stamps, the county has not typically devoted many resources to the program. The county partners with Eagle County to oversee food cards for the mid- to upper-Roaring Fork Valley. Demand has stretched both governments’ resources thin. Pitkin County paid to add a new staff position in 2010 to meet the unprecedented demand.
While the feds pay for the benefits, local governments pay to administer the program...."
(Read more? Click title)
"Unapologetically pursuing and tracking patterns within the news others make since 2010."
April 15, 2012
SandBoxBlogs: Summit Daily News "Tamara Drangstveit and Rob Murphy: Why support our local working families?"
It looks like the big dust-up over in Summit County regarding living wage, affordable housing (and all related issues) and struggling working families has finally come to a peak.
So, let's gather up a few links out of the past few weeks of dozens of links available, and toss some of it up.
First, let's deal with reality for the little guy:
Tamara Drangstveit and Rob Murphy:
"...The Colorado Self-Sufficiency Standard is a tool for understanding the economic challenges of low- and moderate-income families. This county-by-county measure describes a “self-sufficiency wage,” or amount that a family must earn to avoid relying on public or private assistance, for a variety of family types. In Summit County, for example, a single parent with an infant must earn $23.24 per hour full-time, or a little over $49,000 per year. A couple with an infant and preschooler must earn $18.21 per hour per adult, or $76,939 annually. The standard only looks at the basic needs of families; housing, food, child care, health care and transportation.
The standard indicates a large gap between “poverty” and “self-sufficiency” in Summit County. The 2012 Federal Poverty Level for the first family is $18,920, and for the second family $28,820. While there are families in Summit who earn at or below federal poverty level, there are far more who earn above it, but still fail to meet the Self-Sufficiency Standard.
So how do these standards compare to the realities of the local workforce? In 2010, nearly 50 percent of jobs in Summit were in the accommodation/food service industry, with an average annual wage of $23,348. This level of income does lend itself to self-sufficiency.
Housing and child care costs are typically the largest pieces of a family's budget. The challenge of affording housing and child care costs is faced not only by lower-earning families, but middle-income parents as well. This includes long-time locals who alternate between different types of seasonal work, those who work multiple part-time jobs to try and make ends meet, and those who work year-round, full-time and still struggle to keep up.
Child care is near the top the of expense list. The Self-Sufficiency Standard's estimated monthly child care cost for the single parent with an infant is $838, and for couple with an infant and preschooler, $2,034 (note the child care expense for the second family far exceeds even a typical rent payment for a 2-bedroom apartment). When combined with a budget where at least 30 percent, and sometimes more than 50 percent is allocated for rent, there's not much left at the end of the month for other basic needs like food, transportation, and health care." (Read more? Click title)
Now, let's hear only exactly what he said from the guy who lit the fuse that set off the big dust-up, Frank Kent of Breckenridge:
"First, a warm welcome to the new Breckenridge Town Council members. Second, lets get to work! Here is some advice for the entire council:
1) Now is the right time to establish new and better priorities for our town. Focus on restoring basic services. Cut out the social welfare programs. (Granted..he might should have put quotation marks around the buzz kill words of 'social welfare')
2) Stop the imaginative and illogical rationalizations that attempt to justify wasteful spending on child care and affordable housing; Mayor Warner being the worst offender. Describing local government waste as “just another town amenity” is dumb. No one I know thinks spending on things that serve the entire community like fire/police protection, public works, open space, rec center or the golf course is the same as making transfer payments to a select few. There is no comparison. I suggest you start here: Cut out all funding for spending that benefits less than 15 percent of Breckenridge residents. Then, improve funding for basic services that serve the entire town and its visitors.
3) Start making decisions based on real and current data. There are tons of existing deed-restricted houses for sale. Building more hurts our community. Likewise, local daycare centers are at less than 70 percent capacity with 66 percent of children enrolled not even living in Breckenridge. Common sense dictates spending in these areas should be zero in the current environment. Just keep an eye on the facts and adjust in the future if things change.
Many of us are counting on the new council to set a new direction. With corrected priorities we can all be optimistic about maintaining our town's character while achieving sensible economic development."
(Read the original letter? Click the link to Frank's name)
Now, let's toss up a few 'interpretations' of what Frank said. Click the links to read:
http://www.summitdaily.com/article/20120408/LETTER/120409849/1025&parentprofile=1058
http://www.summitdaily.com/article/20120411/LETTER/120419997/1025&parentprofile=1058
http://www.summitdaily.com/article/20120414/LETTER/120419923/1025&parentprofile=1058
http://www.summitdaily.com/article/20120414/LETTER/120419926/1025&parentprofile=1058
To read the shameless exploiting by the Summit Daily with subsequent articles, etc. after Frank's letter came out; just surf what is usually a pretty balanced newspaper that is usually respectable in its presentations. Just click here to get to the current day front page.
Here's what 'SandBox Nanny' hears Frank 'just sayin':
1. He's obviously been around the area for awhile and understands that the real problem with "affordable housing" and "employee housing" is a developer taking advantage problem ultimately. Not the folks in the houses themselves. Notice his reference to the major gut of open deed restricted housing in Breckenridge. (whisper...whisper...sounds like Pitkin, Garfield and Eagle counties, doesn't it?...whisper...whisper...)
2. He's paying for that child care and wants the rules enforced. The rules are you have to live in Breckenridge. He's not saying chuck the kiddos and parents out in the cold, bitter winter with no place to go. Just make the ones that do not live in Breck stay in their own towns with that supplied child care. (whisper....whisper....sort of sounds like our illegal foreign nationals and unsecured borders problem, doesn't it...whisper...whisper...and again... like Pitkin, Garfield and Eagle counties...whisper...whisper...)
3. On child care, he's also saying that he understands the issue. Adjust in the future when there are changes. Adapt, be flexible and go for win-win. (whisper...whisper...gosh...maybe he's hinting at government and the parents using child care sit down and really look for solutions...whisper...whisper....)
Now, go back up and re-read Tamara and Rob's reality check for the folks. How does anyone know that Frank Kent isn't one of those falling in self-sufficiency brackets? If he isn't, betcha he knows what the reality of those brackets are. It shows in his informed content of his letter.
Where does the real fix on all things 'deed-restricted' lie?
Could it possibly be in the cleaning up of the soft corruption in the development, building and planning and cronyism within local governments? Just imagine a world where no one was milking easy access in order to get a big personal pay day on a build at the same time they eventually hold the nest egg of getting that deed restricted housing 'back' when it starts to fall apart or renters/owners have personal issues while keeping up with the ridiculous rules that treat them as....well...basically chattel.
"Unapologetically pursuing and tracking patterns within the news others make since 2010."
So, let's gather up a few links out of the past few weeks of dozens of links available, and toss some of it up.
First, let's deal with reality for the little guy:
Tamara Drangstveit and Rob Murphy:
"...The Colorado Self-Sufficiency Standard is a tool for understanding the economic challenges of low- and moderate-income families. This county-by-county measure describes a “self-sufficiency wage,” or amount that a family must earn to avoid relying on public or private assistance, for a variety of family types. In Summit County, for example, a single parent with an infant must earn $23.24 per hour full-time, or a little over $49,000 per year. A couple with an infant and preschooler must earn $18.21 per hour per adult, or $76,939 annually. The standard only looks at the basic needs of families; housing, food, child care, health care and transportation.
The standard indicates a large gap between “poverty” and “self-sufficiency” in Summit County. The 2012 Federal Poverty Level for the first family is $18,920, and for the second family $28,820. While there are families in Summit who earn at or below federal poverty level, there are far more who earn above it, but still fail to meet the Self-Sufficiency Standard.
So how do these standards compare to the realities of the local workforce? In 2010, nearly 50 percent of jobs in Summit were in the accommodation/food service industry, with an average annual wage of $23,348. This level of income does lend itself to self-sufficiency.
Housing and child care costs are typically the largest pieces of a family's budget. The challenge of affording housing and child care costs is faced not only by lower-earning families, but middle-income parents as well. This includes long-time locals who alternate between different types of seasonal work, those who work multiple part-time jobs to try and make ends meet, and those who work year-round, full-time and still struggle to keep up.
Child care is near the top the of expense list. The Self-Sufficiency Standard's estimated monthly child care cost for the single parent with an infant is $838, and for couple with an infant and preschooler, $2,034 (note the child care expense for the second family far exceeds even a typical rent payment for a 2-bedroom apartment). When combined with a budget where at least 30 percent, and sometimes more than 50 percent is allocated for rent, there's not much left at the end of the month for other basic needs like food, transportation, and health care." (Read more? Click title)
Now, let's hear only exactly what he said from the guy who lit the fuse that set off the big dust-up, Frank Kent of Breckenridge:
"First, a warm welcome to the new Breckenridge Town Council members. Second, lets get to work! Here is some advice for the entire council:
1) Now is the right time to establish new and better priorities for our town. Focus on restoring basic services. Cut out the social welfare programs. (Granted..he might should have put quotation marks around the buzz kill words of 'social welfare')
2) Stop the imaginative and illogical rationalizations that attempt to justify wasteful spending on child care and affordable housing; Mayor Warner being the worst offender. Describing local government waste as “just another town amenity” is dumb. No one I know thinks spending on things that serve the entire community like fire/police protection, public works, open space, rec center or the golf course is the same as making transfer payments to a select few. There is no comparison. I suggest you start here: Cut out all funding for spending that benefits less than 15 percent of Breckenridge residents. Then, improve funding for basic services that serve the entire town and its visitors.
3) Start making decisions based on real and current data. There are tons of existing deed-restricted houses for sale. Building more hurts our community. Likewise, local daycare centers are at less than 70 percent capacity with 66 percent of children enrolled not even living in Breckenridge. Common sense dictates spending in these areas should be zero in the current environment. Just keep an eye on the facts and adjust in the future if things change.
Many of us are counting on the new council to set a new direction. With corrected priorities we can all be optimistic about maintaining our town's character while achieving sensible economic development."
(Read the original letter? Click the link to Frank's name)
Now, let's toss up a few 'interpretations' of what Frank said. Click the links to read:
http://www.summitdaily.com/article/20120408/LETTER/120409849/1025&parentprofile=1058
http://www.summitdaily.com/article/20120411/LETTER/120419997/1025&parentprofile=1058
http://www.summitdaily.com/article/20120414/LETTER/120419923/1025&parentprofile=1058
http://www.summitdaily.com/article/20120414/LETTER/120419926/1025&parentprofile=1058
To read the shameless exploiting by the Summit Daily with subsequent articles, etc. after Frank's letter came out; just surf what is usually a pretty balanced newspaper that is usually respectable in its presentations. Just click here to get to the current day front page.
Here's what 'SandBox Nanny' hears Frank 'just sayin':
1. He's obviously been around the area for awhile and understands that the real problem with "affordable housing" and "employee housing" is a developer taking advantage problem ultimately. Not the folks in the houses themselves. Notice his reference to the major gut of open deed restricted housing in Breckenridge. (whisper...whisper...sounds like Pitkin, Garfield and Eagle counties, doesn't it?...whisper...whisper...)
2. He's paying for that child care and wants the rules enforced. The rules are you have to live in Breckenridge. He's not saying chuck the kiddos and parents out in the cold, bitter winter with no place to go. Just make the ones that do not live in Breck stay in their own towns with that supplied child care. (whisper....whisper....sort of sounds like our illegal foreign nationals and unsecured borders problem, doesn't it...whisper...whisper...and again... like Pitkin, Garfield and Eagle counties...whisper...whisper...)
3. On child care, he's also saying that he understands the issue. Adjust in the future when there are changes. Adapt, be flexible and go for win-win. (whisper...whisper...gosh...maybe he's hinting at government and the parents using child care sit down and really look for solutions...whisper...whisper....)
Now, go back up and re-read Tamara and Rob's reality check for the folks. How does anyone know that Frank Kent isn't one of those falling in self-sufficiency brackets? If he isn't, betcha he knows what the reality of those brackets are. It shows in his informed content of his letter.
Where does the real fix on all things 'deed-restricted' lie?
Could it possibly be in the cleaning up of the soft corruption in the development, building and planning and cronyism within local governments? Just imagine a world where no one was milking easy access in order to get a big personal pay day on a build at the same time they eventually hold the nest egg of getting that deed restricted housing 'back' when it starts to fall apart or renters/owners have personal issues while keeping up with the ridiculous rules that treat them as....well...basically chattel.
"Unapologetically pursuing and tracking patterns within the news others make since 2010."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)