"An article in Saturday’s edition about the 9th Judicial District Attorney’s Office appealing a judge’s sanction contained incorrect information. The trial court’s order dismissing the case is a final order for purposes of appeal. But if the office wins the appeal, the defendant can be brought back to trial..."
(Read original correction? Click title)
__________________________________________________
Note from SandBox:
(Now that DA Beeson has thrown his hat in the ring for district attorney in the 9th, please take note that there will be no special treatment given to any news press surrounding his race. His articles, if they are SandBox worthy or chosen in the daily agg run-up; will be put up just like anyone else in a political race. What SandBox Commentators will continue to do, is heavily moderate his articles. We are the only news media that provides the courtesty of moderating commentary from the general public on 9th Judicial District and Mr. Beeson's articles. )
Chad Abraham:
"Even though Aguilera-Pimentel cannot be prosecuted again, Beeson decided to appeal.
The “issue of the sanctions imposed by the district court in our case is one of high importance statewide as it basically sets a standard of absolute perfection when dealing with discovery issues,” Beeson said in an email. “We believe this to be an issue of policy statewide, and we are confident that once the merits of the appeal are actually considered, we will prevail.”...." (Read more? Click title)
"Unapologetically pursuing and tracking patterns within the news others make since 2010."
